[Mr Rogers]

You cannot ASSUME Obama is ineligible, and then use that as proof.

If you have PROOF, this whole discussion will change. Then Obama could be found guilty of fraud, and Congress could remove him.

Your proof?

Oh...you don’t have any. You want to use the courts to find some.

Doesn’t work that way. Obama is innocent until proven guilty.

[BP2]

If you have PROOF, this whole discussion will change.

What proof do YOU have?

Ah, let me guess ... The "proof" NEVER to have appeared in a Court Room or elsewhere, except for the offices of FactCheck, a printout or computer monitor.

Which REALLY doesn't matter anyway, as the sitting POTUS is a born British Subject.

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

[Red Steel]

We've had the conversation about "proof"; Obama controls just about all the "proof" by hiding behind laws that violate their true intent than Obama is using them for.

Oh...you don’t have any. You want to use the courts to find some.

The coward and lying Obama won't voluntarily prove that he is eligible.

However, there is plenty of contradicting evidence to the Obama official story line if people would honesty looked at the evidence, something that you deny.

Doesn’t work that way. Obama is innocent until proven guilty.

Actually, Obama is highly likely to face multiple states and their laws for him to prove that he is eligible to hold office before they put his happy @ss on the next presidential state ballots in 2012. I suspect Obozo will not run when faced with possibility of revealing his perfidy.