Replies

It is in the court system now. Berg is pursueing it at his speed not yours, and I pretty much guarantee that he does not give a cr!p about what you might or might not think.

I'm sure he doesn't, since it's the judges' opinions, not mine, that matter. Unfortunately, no judge seems to have thought his cases had any merit, and I suspect he will continue to find them to be of this opinion as he continues filing his frivolous suits.

Circumstantially, it makes sense to believe that Berg has heard the recording, and as such has proceeded with it.

IMHO, it doesn't make much sense to believe anything coming out of the mouth of a guy who thinks 9-11 was an inside job.

The fact that you have not heard it, means nothing.

Apparently, no one has heard it except Berg and his client, which doesn't inspire much confidence. Good luck convincing anyone with that kind of evidence.

Feel free to find definitive proof that this was never said, like a statement by Michelle Obama, reported by API.

LOL. You're asking me to prove a negative. Let me give you a little lesson in logic. The burden of proof is on the one who makes a positive assertion that something happened, not on the person who would deny it.

It is in the court system now. Berg is pursueing it at his speed not yours, and I pretty much guarantee that he does not give a cr!p about what you might or might not think.
****
I’m sure he doesn’t, since it’s the judges’ opinions, not mine, that matter. Unfortunately, no judge seems to have thought his cases had any merit, and I suspect he will continue to find them to be of this opinion as he continues filing his frivolous suits.

No case has been heard on its merits thus far. So your opinion is speculation at best.

Circumstantially, it makes sense to believe that Berg has heard the recording, and as such has proceeded with it.
****
IMHO, it doesn’t make much sense to believe anything coming out of the mouth of a guy who thinks 9-11 was an inside job.

It appears that you also seem to believe that you shoot the messenger, and ignore the message.

Feel free to find definitive proof that this was never said, like a statement by Michelle Obama, reported by API.
***
LOL. You’re asking me to prove a negative. Let me give you a little lesson in logic. The burden of proof is on the one who makes a positive assertion that something happened, not on the person who would deny it.

I showed you where it was stated, provided a link, and even the Attorney pursuing it. You stated that it was not true. You have answered my informtion with an opinion. I asked you to substantiate that opinon with more credible evidence. That sir, is debate. You are correct that the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion, which is you, that it is not true. Its your turn to state that it was JUST an opinion, or back up your words with credible evidence. Either one is fine with me.