Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Partisan Gunslinger

“I don’t believe in abolishing the drug laws.”

That’s nice. What does it have to do with the “biblical conservative” line?

“I don’t believe in restricting trade through tariffs. “

Yet it’s ok for us to enter into deals that allow the other party to use tariffs against us? You prefer the income tax?

“Immoral acts hurt others sometimes indirectly.”

Government cannot legislate morality. People have to do that. Do you want alcohol abolished too? What good did that server last time?

“I’m a supporter of the Patriot Act, it got the American Muslims under control.”

That’s laughable. Seriously laughable. It did NOT SUCH THING. In fact, they’ve become emboldened since 9-11.

” Do you believe the bible is the place to look to get political advice? If not you’re not a biblical conservative.”

The Bible - particularly the New Testement - informs my basic opinions. Are you familiar with the concept of “free will?”

“’93 World Trade Center was CONUS, Oklahoma City was CONUS. Did you sleep through those?”

I’m the one who first brought up the ‘93 WTC attack, sparky. OKC was CONUS, but you have not proven it was Saddam. The USS Cole was definitely NOT CONUS.

” Major terrorist attacks against Americans happened about 1 per year until Bush ended them after 9-11.”

Not in CONUS, they didn’t. The certainly didn’t stop OCOCUS after he became President.

“Results do not support anything you say. The major attacks eneded with 9-11. Bush’s policies were correct.”

So, inviting the Saudis here and putting CAIR in with the FBI HELPED SECURITY? Are you nuts?

“So. They were against Americans. That ended under Bush.”

OK, you are nuts. We’ve established that.

“Ha! Talk about being naive and not paying attention. You believe everything Dan Rather tells you? lol”

You dismiss my claims regarding the Saudi backing of the Jihad - something I can prove easily - yet expect me to just accept that Saddam was behind the OKC bombing. I’m familiar with the theory that there was MUSLIM involvement in that attack, but Saddam? Prove it.


160 posted on 04/25/2010 10:35:57 AM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Favor Center
That’s nice. What does it have to do with the “biblical conservative” line?

Sorcery = Drug dealing.

Yet it’s ok for us to enter into deals that allow the other party to use tariffs against us? You prefer the income tax?

I most certainly do. a 10% income tax and a land tax are the only two major taxes we need. All other taxes should be abolished and we should never have tariffs. Tariffs only hurt the contries that institute them, they create inefficiencies. Biblically, the income tax is the tithe...10%. During the Judges the tithe was the tax since the government was ran through the temples. The land tax is equal to the gleaning and the set-aside programs.

Government cannot legislate morality.

Spoken like a true Libertarian.

People have to do that. Do you want alcohol abolished too? What good did that server last time?

Jesus drank wine. A substance hould be either legal or illegal, not a revenue generator. Alcohol good, heroine bad. Let's have a referendum...alcohol would stay legal, illegal drugs would stay illegal.

That’s laughable. Seriously laughable. It did NOT SUCH THING. In fact, they’ve become emboldened since 9-11.

No major attacks anywhere against us since 9-11...it was a total success.

The Bible - particularly the New Testement - informs my basic opinions. Are you familiar with the concept of “free will?”

Certainly. Should people have free will to commit murder? Walk naked in the streets? Or do other obscene things in the streets as long as they don't hurt other people? This is where Libertarianism breaks down...there has to be order.

I’m the one who first brought up the ‘93 WTC attack, sparky. OKC was CONUS, but you have not proven it was Saddam. The USS Cole was definitely NOT CONUS.

You brought up CONUS, not I. I said we haven't been attacked since 9-11. I'm not giving you a history lesson on OKC. You claim to know terrorism...if you don't know that Saddam was behind OKC you don't know squat.

Not in CONUS, they didn’t. The certainly didn’t stop OCOCUS after he became President.

What does CONUS have to do with it? Tell me one major terrorist attack against us since 9-11.

So, inviting the Saudis here and putting CAIR in with the FBI HELPED SECURITY? Are you nuts?

Legal immigration has never been eliminated. The Patriot Act got them under control.

You dismiss my claims regarding the Saudi backing of the Jihad - something I can prove easily - yet expect me to just accept that Saddam was behind the OKC bombing. I’m familiar with the theory that there was MUSLIM involvement in that attack, but Saddam? Prove it.

I don't give history lessons to Libertarians. You guys are irreconcilable because you can't see reality. If you don't know about Saddam's involvement in OKC, you know nothing about terrorism and you are a useful idiot to the MSM and the traitors in high places in this country.

161 posted on 04/25/2010 3:23:06 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson