[Balding_Eagle]

I still say you dodged the answer, because I know your answer, and it's a lot shorter, and different, than the answer you typed out.

Nevertheless;

How much evidence does a prosecutor need to lack before you will think the defendant has the right to be declared not guilty?

To a level where the jury is not convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

[SeeSharp]

To a level where the jury is not convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Exactly. Just like O.J.

Except of course O.J. was guilty, which demonstrates my point that a jury verdict is not proof but only the opinion of the jury.