Skip to comments.
Why 'Exonerated' Needs to Be Used Sparingly
The Dallas Morning News ^
| Fri, Apr 09, 2010
| Michael Landauer
Posted on 04/11/2010 1:34:01 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: Balding_Eagle
Well since I have answered yours why don’t you prove you’re not just an argumentative troll and give it a shot.
21
posted on
04/11/2010 6:58:00 PM PDT
by
SeeSharp
To: SeeSharp
I still say you dodged the answer, because I know your answer, and it's a lot shorter, and different, than the answer you typed out.
Nevertheless;
How much evidence does a prosecutor need to lack before you will think the defendant has the right to be declared not guilty?
To a level where the jury is not convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
22
posted on
04/11/2010 7:05:55 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
To: Balding_Eagle
To a level where the jury is not convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Exactly. Just like O.J.
Except of course O.J. was guilty, which demonstrates my point that a jury verdict is not proof but only the opinion of the jury.
23
posted on
04/11/2010 7:34:50 PM PDT
by
SeeSharp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson