[Smokin' Joe]

Any organization that is composed of humans is going to have human foibles and human errors and bad human judgment in it. Nobody is in a position to be able to throw stones.

It's the cover up that makes it so much worse

Granted, but again, I reiterate. It is that judgement to which I refer. The acts are indefensible. The accounts in the media of the reaction to them relfects questionable judgement in that reaction.

I was not there, I pretend no knowledge of what was said nor that which was done, nor of the protocols for handling such instances, but the appearance the media gives is that the choices were of questionable nature.

However, the MSM is composed of people, many of whom have an axe to grind with the one Church which has failed to yield onany of the MSM's pet issues, especially abortion and homosexuality.

To present a gay-infused and often atheistic media as an unbiased attacker would be disingenious indeed.

[wmfights]

The accounts in the media of the reaction to them relfects questionable judgement in that reaction.

I would agree that the media always has an agenda and rarely is objective.

I was not there, I pretend no knowledge of what was said nor that which was done, nor of the protocols for handling such instances, but the appearance the media gives is that the choices were of questionable nature.

I would suggest watching the documentary "Deliver Us from Evil". I'm sure it's not totally objective, but there is a lot of well documented information.

It's the cover up that makes this so bad.

To present a gay-infused and often atheistic media as an unbiased attacker would be disingenious indeed.

I wouldn't disagree. However, there are so many other places to go to get information about this that some facts are well established.

[wmfights]

The accounts in the media of the reaction to them relfects questionable judgement in that reaction.

I would agree that the media always has an agenda and rarely is objective.

I was not there, I pretend no knowledge of what was said nor that which was done, nor of the protocols for handling such instances, but the appearance the media gives is that the choices were of questionable nature.

I would suggest watching the documentary "Deliver Us from Evil". I'm sure it's not totally objective, but there is a lot of well documented information.

It's the cover up that makes this so bad.

To present a gay-infused and often atheistic media as an unbiased attacker would be disingenious indeed.

I wouldn't disagree. However, there are so many other places to go to get information about this that some facts are well established.