[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

pinging for significant update info.

Was reading the comments at JoNova to this article:

I’m speaking on GlobalCooling Radio Saturday morning (US time)

.... and someone pointed to this website and article:

IPCC'S FATAL ERRORS--

***************************EXCERPTS*******************************************

INTERNAL MODELING MISTAKES BY IPCC ARE SUFFICIENT TO REJECT ITS ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING CONJECTURE

ALBEDO REGULATES CLIMATE, NOT THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT. CO2 HAS NO MEASURABLE EFFECT ON CLIMATE.

FATAL ERRORS IN IPCC'S GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS

by Jeffrey A. Glassman, PhD

Revised 9/30/09.

-

Some critics of the science of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) urge that its reliance on a consensus of scientists is false, while others simply point out that regardless, science is never decided by consensus. Some critics rely on fresh analyses of radiosonde and satellite data to conclude that water vapor feedback is negative, contrary to its representation in Global Climate Models (GCMs). Some argue that the AGW model must be false because the climate has cooled over the last decade while atmospheric CO2 continued its rise. Researchers discovered an error in the reduction of data, the widely publicized Hockey Stick Effect, that led to a false conclusion that the Little Ice Age was not global. Some argue that polar ice is not disappearing, that polar bears are thriving, and that sea level is not rising any significant amount.

To the public, these arguments cast a pall over AGW claims. But in a last analysis, they merely weigh indirectly against published positions, weigh against the art of data reduction, or rely on short-term data trends in a long-term forecast. Such charges cannot prevail against the weight of the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and its network of associated specialists in the field, principally climatologists, should they ever choose to respond categorically. Moreover, these proponents can support their positions with hundreds running into thousands of published, peer-reviewed papers, plus the official IPCC publications, to weigh against tissue-paper-thin arguments, many published online with at best informal and on-going peer review.

On the other hand, what can carry the day are the errors and omissions included in the AGW model with respect to real and demonstrable processes that affect Earth's climate. Here is a list of eight major modeling faults for which IPCC should be held to account.

• 1. IPCC errs to add manmade effects to natural effects.
• 2. IPCC errs to discard on-going natural processes at initialization.
• 3. IPCC errs to model the surface layer of the ocean in equilibrium.
• 4. IPCC errs to erase the global pattern of atmospheric CO2 concentration from its model.
• 5. IPCC errs to model climate without the full dynamic exchange of CO2 between the atmosphere and the ocean.
• 6. IPCC errs to model different absorption rates for natural and manmade CO2 without justification
• 7. IPCC errs to model climate without its first order behavior.
• 8. IPCC errs to model climate as regulated by greenhouse gases instead of by albedo.

  ********************************************************

  For detail go to the link.......

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Don’t know if the Professor would agree with the Author or Authors of the article just above..

[Marine_Uncle]

Roger that E. Bookmarked the site for further reading as time permits. A number of scientist are starting to come out with some interesting things regarding all the falsifications and errors in bad models at best those at IPPC underlings have produced for a number of years.