1) Are you under the impression that during the past two centuries, Presidential candidates have ever had to show that they did not have any foreign citizenships at birth, or having to swear that they were not born with any dual citizenships? Because I'm unaware of any such test or requirement having ever been applied by election officials.
Not one US president has ever had legal challenges against them for being ineligible for office except for Obama. The natural born linage was unquestionable for all of them except for Chester Arthur who successfully hid his from the public until he was out of presidential office.
2) If having a foreign country grant an automatic citizenship at birth is an absolute disqualification, going forward, how do you propose that future Presidential candidates should demonstrate that no foreign country granted them any such automatic citizenship at birth?
We can start with the states asking for his US birth certificates for starters before they are put on their respective state ballots. From there, one could see if their parents were citizens of the United States at the time of the candidates' birth date.
Damning evidence is mounting against Obama. Evidence that he was never born in the United States. As the Kenyan Minister for Lands, Mr. Erengo stated on March 25, 2010 as a matter of fact in front of the Kenyan Parliament:
"If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."
No one corrected Minister Erengo about his statement that Obama was born in Kenya and is not a native American - no one did. It doesn't look good for the Obots as the drip, drip, and more drip of evidence as it continues before the Obama Administration implodes from all the lies.
Last I checked, they were pretty much leaving that thread alone. For some odd reason; yet they’re bunched up over here.