She, Chiyome Fukino, is not a lawyer, nor did she offer any support of her ‘finding’ on a subject of the most weighty and unsettled Constitutional law. Subsequent requests to Hawaiian officials for clarification and support of that bold statement of fact that were made by various requestors under a number of public access statutes have been stonewalled.
Even the most minimal sense of duty, politeness and respect for the opinions of those whom she serves — would bid her to explain how it was she was able to state so boldly such a thing.
Without such, and with the abject stonewalling, it is entirely clear to all unbiased observers that Fukino and Hawaiian officials are covering up something that is not right, not in order.
The statutes of the state of Hawaii spell out explicitly what her duties are along with those of the Registrar of Vital Statistics whose name appears on all Hawaii Certifications of Live Birth, including Obama’s.
Dr. Fukino has stated her legal rationales very explicitly and posted them to the Department of Health’s web site for all to read and understand:
http://www.hi5deposit.com/health/vital-records/obama.html
Judges and justices tend to pay attention to the constitutional officers of a state government.
You are free to believe whatever you want about coverups and conspiracies but Obama’s original birth documents can be subpoenaed at any time without Obama’s permission and NO ONE has sought such a subpoena in the two plus years that this issue has been in the public.
As the blogger at the link you yourself gave says:
Hawaii must release whatever they used to arrive at the determination that Obama is a "natural-born American citizen", and that may include correspondence between various parties. Of course, that doesn't mean they'll release anything or that the analysis is correct or that they won't try to claim exceptions under the 92F-13 section at the last page. The link above claims that he's making requests and others are doing the same; it would be very interesting to see what results.That was written seven months and one week ago. Where is Hawaii's response to the requests that they received for the analysis used to make such a strikingly bold claim!
Obama's father of best-record-to-date, his father that he claims and all his biographers claim is one Barack Obama, a citizen of Kenyan and never a US citizen. That fact of paternity ALONE, by many informed legal opinions, means that the man now in the White House -- whether he be truly named after that Kenyan or by whatever name he is using -- is ineligible to hols the office as he is not a 'natural born' citizen.
What settled US Court opinion does Hawaii -- Fukino and her legal advisor Bennett -- apply in this case?
It is a simple and natural question, and the fact that it is not answered is a straightforward indicator of a cover-up.