Not hardly. There is a decision as recent as 1971 that says those born citizens, who are citizens because of 8 USC 1401, who were born outside the US are naturalized and not even covered by the 14th amendment, since they are not “naturalized in the United States”. Basically the decision indicates that their “citizenship from birth” may be removed for failure to meet certain criteria. This is not true of person’s naturalized in the US, unless it can be determined that they were naturalized based on fraudulently provided information.
She, Chiyome Fukino, is not a lawyer, nor did she offer any support of her 'finding' on a subject of the most weighty and unsettled Constitutional law. Subsequent requests to Hawaiian officials for clarification and support of that bold statement of fact that were made by various requestors under a number of public access statutes have been stonewalled.
Even the most minimal sense of duty, politeness and respect for the opinions of those whom she serves -- would bid her to explain how it was she was able to state so boldly such a thing.
Without such, and with the abject stonewalling, it is entirely clear to all unbiased observers that Fukino and Hawaiian officials are covering up something that is not right, not in order.