[Las Vegas Ron]

But these order are a result of bammies “surge”

Aren't the orders in that regard coming from him then?

[bushpilot1]

“[The naturalized citizen] becomes a member of the society, possessing all the rights of a native citizen, and standing, in the view of the constitution,”

note the USC ruling does not say a naturalized citizen has the same rights as a natural born citizen. We know a naturalized citizen cannot be president.

There must be a difference between a natural born citizen and a native citizen e.g. citizen.

BLACK, J., Opinion of the Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

387 U.S. 253
Afroyim v. Rusk
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 456 Argued: February 20, 1967 -— Decided: May 29, 1967

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0387_0253_ZO.html

[CharlesWayneCT]

The person who would have to decide if the orders came from the rightful President would be the person who received hte orders from the President.

It’s not the job of the grunts to determine that lawful orders they are given originated with the President. They are only supposed to evaluate whether the orders are to do something that would be lawful.

In this case, the argument is whether the President is entitled to be President.

But it’s no different than asking whether the orders you get really started with an order legally signed by the President. And we can’t have hundreds of thousands of troops each of which can refuse to obey an order until a court decides if the President authorized the order.