[Red Steel]

The Supreme Court never said or held Wong Kim Ark to be a natural born citizen. However, the silly judges in Indiana wrongly concluded Ark was a natural born as a legal and historical basis? Nice slight of hand on your citing that silly Indiana Ankeny v. Indie Governor case and not giving it credit:

Indiana: "we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."

Funny that no other court has concluded this in over a hundred years since 1898 but these guys have...just plain ignorance.

Being disingenuous is certainly you.

[STARWISE]

The Indiana decision, if it can even
be called that, is a joke.

[tired_old_conservative]

“The Supreme Court never said or held Wong Kim Ark to be a natural born citizen. However, the silly judges in Indiana wrongly concluded Ark was a natural born as a legal and historical basis? Nice slight of hand on your citing that silly Indiana Ankeny v. Indie Governor case and not giving it credit:

Indiana: “we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

Funny that no other court has concluded this in over a hundred years since 1898 but these guys have...just plain ignorance.

Being disingenuous is certainly you.”

No other court was specifically asked this question. That's why no other court specifically said it. Anyone versed in the law would not find that a point even worth raising.

This court was asked and did say it because the answer is pretty straight forward. So you do what people ignorant of the law always do—sit on your bar stool and snarl nastily about judges and anyone else competent in the subject matter.