Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Red Steel

Was Obama sworn in by the Chief Justice? I believe so...

Has ANY case been found to have merit? I thought not...

The military is outside of politics. Let someone else fight it out. Until then, the military needs to assume someone who won the vote, the Electoral College, and is accepted by the Congress and the Supreme Court is, indeed, the lawful President.

There is nothing unlawful about a deployment order. Obey it, or be punished. Or put in your papers and retire ASAP, although he would have had to do that as soon as Obama was elected, since it takes 6 months to retire.


117 posted on 04/09/2010 6:20:03 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
"Was Obama sworn in by the Chief Justice? I believe so..."

That's like saying that since a priest married you and your wife that the Catholic Church certifies you are both marriagable and not already encumbered. No so-called "birther" case has made it to the Supreme Court, now has it?

121 posted on 04/09/2010 6:26:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2312894/posts?page=242)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Was Obama sworn in by the Chief Justice? I believe so...

Roberts was not going to refuse the swearing in without deadbang reason not to. Maybe Robert E'ffed up the first time in swearing in Obama on purpose? It is not a realistic scenario for Roberts not to do so, and because he went forward with it, doesn't support your faulty premise that Obama is qualified to hold office per Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution.

There is nothing unlawful about a deployment order. Obey it, or be punished.

Deployment order come from the SECDEF a cabinet position that performs delegated duties from the President of the United States. The President derives his authority and legitimacy from the US Constitution. If he is in violation of said Constitution because he is not eligible to hold office, he would haves no legitimacy or authority to give orders, therefore, the orders he gives would be unlawful.

130 posted on 04/09/2010 6:36:36 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Has ANY case been found to have merit?

Merit in who's eyes, the courts? The same courts who time and time again can not even be unanimous on the 2nd Amendment?

We the citizens supposedly are the ones who own this country, not the courts.

283 posted on 04/10/2010 4:39:07 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson