Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

And what, Obama is implementing the neocon’s domestic policy?

Ron Paul’s domestic policy is less goverment. I’m much more concerned about domestic policy and too big government than whether we spend kazillions of dollars racing around the middle east until everyone that we think could possibly sometime consider doing anything that could theoretically be seen as support for someone who might harbor a secret desire to do something that might be against what some might consider our best interests.

I’m in favor of less war and less involvement in the middle east, but I really don’t care that much. I want less government and more freedom in my own personal life. Wars are costly, like anything else. And I’d prefer the foreign policy solution that means I’ll pay lower taxes.

I happen to like Paul, and second most Palin. I haven’t been liking a few things that Palin has been doing recently, but it’s really too soon to tell what all of her positions will be. Palin does have tremendous charisma, likeability, hotness, and vote getting ability. Her resume indicates that she could be for smaller government - which is priority 1. But if she continues down the Bush/Cheney II path, she won’t win in November.


39 posted on 04/09/2010 3:35:02 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: truthfreedom
And what, Obama is implementing the neocon’s domestic policy?

I'm not even sure what that means, but you can put away the "neocon" boogeyman. It's dead. You've got an anti-Zionist Jew-hater of the first order in the White House. All's right in the world.

I’m much more concerned about domestic policy and too big government than whether we spend kazillions of dollars racing around the middle east until everyone that we think could possibly sometime consider doing anything that could theoretically be seen as support for someone who might harbor a secret desire to do something that might be against what some might consider our best interests.

That's very cute. Not at all based in reality, but cute.

Saddam Hussein waged a terror war on the United States for the better part of eight years, starting with the first WTC attack on the second anniversary of his Gulf War defeat and culminating in the largest attack on American soil in our history on 9/11. That's why he's dead, and that's why we're there. There's nothing theoretical about Hussein's ties to Al Qaeda or our justification for invading Iraq and obliterating his terror-sponsoring regime.

And there's nothing theoretical about what Iran intends to do to Israel. There's nothing secret about it either. Read the papers.

I’m in favor of less war and less involvement in the middle east, but I really don’t care that much.

The Islamists don't care how much you don't care. They want to kill you anyway. But since one of them is now occupying the White House (largely because of the myriad Iraq War lies promoted by the media, the left and their follower travelers in the Ron Paul cult), fighting them in the middle east is a lost cause. And now you get the worst of all worlds. Enjoy.

40 posted on 04/09/2010 5:05:51 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson