You said, “The only problem is that Zero was NOT born ‘out of wedlock’.”
You’re saying definitevly that he was “NOT born ‘out of wedlock’” so I just asked if you had proof of his parent’s marriage by asking if you have ever seen their marriage or divorce certificate. What’s wrong with that?
Nothing at all except there is no such thing as a 'divorce certificate'.
The marriage was acknowledged by a court of law when that court granted the divorce. A court cannot dissolve what does not exist. Ergo, the marriage has been acknowledged as a legal fact.
You also totally ignored the fact that child's citizenship is based on the citizenship of the parent, NOT the marital status of the parent. Being born out of wedlock does not change the citizenship of the child.
-----
Do you believe Zero is natural-born? If so, why?