I believe Arkeny v. Daniels (you can Google it) is the only case to have ruled on the merits, not on standing. It holds that both Obama and McCain were natural born citizens.
“I believe Arkeny v. Daniels (you can Google it) is the only case to have ruled on the merits, not on standing. It holds that both Obama and McCain were natural born citizens.”
This case has been discredited, because it contradicts itself in it’s own footnotes, making the finding effectively useless. At any rate it is merely a State Appeals Court, and not on the Federal level, either District, Appeals, or USSC.... I don’t believe that any Attorney, representing either side of this issue, or in any other court jurisdiction, will be citing Arkeny v Daniels in it’s filing brief. To do so would be inviting the charge of incomptentance.
The thrust of the case is not on point at any rate, because the central question is the about the method of elector certification, and not about candidate eligibility......
Thanks anyway, I quess that there are no cases that are on point with regards to the Requirement of Natural Born Citizenship for Presidential eligibility.....I couldn’t find one either, and had hoped that sharper minds would carry the day.....I’m sure that we will see it in the proper court, sometime soon (like the next couple of years, if the they can quit avoiding the issue, and rediscover judicial courage).