Shoot, I'm even a little iffy on registering cars, and those aren't even explicit constitutional rights. I love how people point to a discrepancy in the treatment of cars vs. guns. I too realize there's kind of a contradiction, but can't figure out why they just point out the difference and think they're done and their case is made.
Why is it assumed that any inconsistency has to be resolved by more government control over the freer case? It would be just as logical to say "Activity A is more heavily regulated than Activity B, and yet people aren't stacked like cordwood from Activity B, we'd better take a fresh look at Activity A and make sure we're not over-regulating it."
bttt!