Neither. I disagree with cut and run when he blames America, and not the terrorists for 9/11.
Ah, but Ron Paul does no such thing.
So, I guess it is fair to say that you, JohnD, do agree with Ron Paul that "only a fool would place the moral responsibility for terrorism on anyone other than the terrorists themselves".
Neither. I disagree with cut and run when he blames America, and not the terrorists for 9/11.
Me too. Can't stand those America blamers. Right now there are bunches of them saying that our President is going to destroy America by unilaterally disarming. Garbage. Just more blaming America. When our foreign policy is to entirely disarm then that is the right foreign policy. Because it is ours, and it can't be wrong. If somebody nukes us, because we have entirely dismantled our defence apparatus, it would not our President's fault. Saying it could be is nothing but blaming America. All good conservatives know that American foreign policy is infallible and cannot ever be wrong, and nothing bad that ever happens can be blamed on any policy that America ever had or will have. We never contribute to it or make any mistakes.
The real mystery, considering this, is just how much these good conservatives who properly hate those who "blame America," people like Giuliani and McCain, like to argue and debate about how important their experience is. What possible difference does experience make? Heck, it doesn't even matter if the person setting policy thinks about it in the first place. Whatever our policy is it will be right, and nothing can be our fault, and so why worry? If our president not only disarmed us, but gave the bombs all to Al Qaeda, and they bombed us into the stone age, it still wouldn't be the fault of the president, because his policy is our policy, and that means it is never to blame.
You aren't one of these people suggesting that America's policies can be wrong and could lead to an attack on us are you? I certainly hope not.