In early March, U.S. President Barack Obama spoke in favour of the agreement, saying it was necessary to protect American businesses and technologies.
1 posted on
04/08/2010 12:34:12 PM PDT by
day21221
To: day21221
The draft text of the treaty includes enhanced search powers for border-crossing guards, allowing them to comb through the personal computers and iPods of travellers. Something I've heard Airport Customs already can do (and it includes searching for illegal mp3 downloads).
2 posted on
04/08/2010 12:38:36 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
To: day21221
Anything tied to the WTO and the UN is never good....the Liberal Globalists may feel otherwise.....but I do not want the WTO or UN involved in anything in the USA
3 posted on
04/08/2010 12:39:14 PM PDT by
UCFRoadWarrior
(JD Hayworth for Senate jdforsenate.com)
To: day21221
Republicans should come out strong against this... but I doubt they will... corporate america will want it...
To: day21221
Punishment for repeat offenders includes a ban from the using the Internet for up to 12 months. Internet license, coming to your future soon, comrade.
5 posted on
04/08/2010 12:39:42 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
To: day21221
David Fewer, director of the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic at the University of Ottawa, has been following the development of the treaty closely and believes it provides little benefit to anyone but large U.S. content producers such as record labels, software makers and technology companies. Because nothing is going to force the corrupt Ahmet Engums of the world who ran the Atlantic Records of this world to actually PAY the Ruth Browns and Sam & Daves of this world. It's business. Collect money off other peoples' efforts and get rich. Settle after decades of lawsuits later.
6 posted on
04/08/2010 12:42:00 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
To: day21221
Would the Bible fall under a copyright protected document? Any way the government could regulate that?
To: day21221
Maybe everything should become public domain after some reasonable length of time. I would hate to export our IP mess into a global mess.
10 posted on
04/08/2010 12:44:06 PM PDT by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: day21221
The draft text of the treaty includes enhanced search powers for border-crossing guards, allowing them to comb through the personal computers and iPods of travellers. And of course the government would NEVER impart any viruses, spyware, or upload your private information...
11 posted on
04/08/2010 12:44:13 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
To: day21221
Intellectual property law is already about as corrupt constitutionally as the “health care reform” bill: the enumerated power under which Congress can pass patent and copyright laws reads
“To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”
It says nothing about securing exclusive rights to commercial interests who neither wrote nor invented anything, nor to literary or scientific estates. The perpetual extensions of copyright terms make a mockery of “for limited Times”. And, objectively, the main effects of current patent and copyright law is to impede progress in science and the useful arts by making derivative works nearly impossible within the law, despite the supposed recognition of fair use.
14 posted on
04/08/2010 12:45:14 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: day21221
the Canadian government would not sign on to the agreement unless it "reflects the best interest of Canadians." Would that our own gov't felt this way.
19 posted on
04/08/2010 12:48:42 PM PDT by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: day21221
Executive Fiat instead of laws - check.
Bills unread before passed - check.
Laws ignored because they are unreasonable - check.
Treaties drafted in secret - check.
The hits just keep coming...
23 posted on
04/08/2010 12:51:45 PM PDT by
Drill Thrawl
(Another day, another injury, another step closer. Are you prepared?)
To: day21221
Etc.
Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.
By Cory Doctorow at 2:13 PM November 3, 2009
The internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama's administration refused to disclose due to "national security" concerns, has leaked. It's bad. It says:
- * That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn't infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.
- * That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet -- and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living -- if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.
- * That the whole world must adopt US-style "notice-and-takedown" rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.
- * Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)
The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting the Pieces TogetherNext: More on secret copyright treaty: your kids could go to jail for noncommercial music sharing
24 posted on
04/08/2010 12:51:58 PM PDT by
Palter
(Kilroy was here.)
To: day21221
I believe the document has been on the internet since January.
Download the consolidated text of ACTA: http://www.laquadrature.net/files/201001_acta.pdf
ACTA is a multi-lateral agreement aimed at setting a standard for enforcing counterfeiting at the global level. The following document may not reflect the current state of the negotiations but it provides the public with an interesting overview of the whole agreement, background on the positions of the different parties, as well as more details regarding:
* The general scope of ACTA;
* Border measures;
* Criminal enforcement;
* International cooperation;
* Enforcement practices;
* The ACTA oversight committee (institutional arrangements chapter).
http://www.laquadrature.net/en/0118-version-of-acta-consolidated-text-leaks
To: N3WBI3; PAR35; Sir_Ed; SubGeniusX; TruthSetsUFree; rabscuttle385; ShadowAce; Baynative; holden; ...
The Copyfraud ping: copyright, patent and trademark law, mainly as applied to the digital age, especially their abuse.
If you want on or off the Copyfraud Ping List,
Freepmail me.
To: day21221
Nice find (for your first thread)
Welcome to FRee Republic!
34 posted on
04/08/2010 1:12:14 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: day21221
HA! The top-secret draft of a global treaty on Copyrights looks like it was stolen with a P2P file sharing program. LOL!
To: day21221
Punishment for repeat offenders includes a ban from the using the Internet for up to 12 months. Bwahh! Ha! Ha! I would like to see them enforce that, since you can get on the internet with most cell phones or game systems and most coffee shops and restaurants provide free Wi-Fi.
PS, if you don't want border guards snooping through your files, encrypt them with a freeware program such as truecrypt, which prides it's self on being virtually uncrackable and NOT providing any form of back door to governemnt or law enforcement
43 posted on
04/08/2010 2:02:20 PM PDT by
apillar
To: sickoflibs
46 posted on
04/08/2010 2:47:22 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
To: day21221
48 posted on
04/08/2010 4:14:51 PM PDT by
indthkr
To: day21221
Eventually copyright will become so draconian and disconnected from reality (not that it already hasn’t, mind you), that we’re all just going to completely ignore it. There is no legitimate reason for a copyright that extends beyond 30 years. Screw Disney and the rat.
50 posted on
04/08/2010 7:46:54 PM PDT by
zeugma
(Waco taught me everything I needed to know about the character of the U.S. Government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson