Where do you draw the line? Ehren Watada refused to deploy because he felt the war was unconstitutional. He 'interpreted' the Constitution so was he right?
In effect, Lakin would be breaking the law by obeying the orders as are the rest of our military, by failing to demand full disclosure from the pretender-in-chief.
So are you saying every person in Iraq and Iran are breaking their oath by being there?
Why do we need to draw a line?? The main difference I see is that Watada challenged on a combination of issues, not just the Constitutionality of the war. By contrast, Obama's Constitutional eligiblity as commander-in-chief is based on a very basic premise that could resolved quickly and completely through full disclosure.
So are you saying every person in Iraq and Iran are breaking their oath by being there?
If Obama is the fraud he appears to be, then, yes, absolutely.
You are a pest on any thread to do with this subject which tells me that you are a hired hack. You don’t have a single argument that makes a lick of sense. You really should be ignored. I will from now on, hope the others do also. Talk to yourself hack. CO