Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PaulZe
A few things:

You've already noted that home insurance is requiremed by the mortgage company (who loaned you the money), not the federal government.

Flood insurance is similar: they can't loan you the money for a property in a flood zone unless you have flood insurance. In this case the "can't" is correct: a federally-regulated institution has to require the insurance. In this case, this is federal regulation of a bank, which insures depositors against failure.

All of the other examples are state-mandated -- not federally mandated. There's a big difference.

Finally, the federal "mandates" for the 55 speed limit and seat belt laws (as well as the age limit for purchasing alcohol) were all imposed the same way: Change your laws, or we will withhold your share of federal gas tax funds that we collected. A state could refuse those funds, on principle... but none did.

33 posted on 04/07/2010 5:59:01 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking

Some states took the money and posted the signs but refused to enforce the 55 limit. I think Montana was one of them.


60 posted on 04/07/2010 6:15:25 PM PDT by John.Galt2012 (I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson