Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raptor22

It’s great news. Although several months ago, many Freepers didn’t see it that way, as you can probably discern from some of the comments in that old thread.

They were cheering on the government to step in and dictate how private enterprises manage their own network resources. ‘How dare these companies think that they have a say in how they manage their own assets and bandwidth resources! It’s ‘MY’ internet, after all...’ was the jist of it.

This was a win for Lady Liberty today, whether they understand or not.


50 posted on 04/06/2010 10:05:32 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: bamahead

My understanding of the net neutrality concept was that the internet providers are simply providing data, ie: 0’s and 1’s. And that as such, they had no business slowing down one set of 0’s and 1’s as opposed to another set, for all data is... is data.

Considering I pay my internet provider for 10Mps download speed, I’d consider it a breech of contract if they decided to slow down my download speeds depending on what site or information I download. But considering my internet provider is Comcast, the same provider who was slapped by the FCC for slowing down the download speed for anyone using bittorrent, it looks like they now have the go-ahead to restrict download speeds regardless of what the contract states.


81 posted on 04/06/2010 8:20:16 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson