When Obama first ran for public office as a
|
When Obama first ran for public office as a
|
Thanks for ping. This article fits right in with your theme.
~~~~~~~~~~
Obama is an example of that peculiar American contribution to the long line of political deviancy, the romantic leftist, a combination of undergrad Marxism, New Deal activism, Great Society idealism, and late 60s dementia. In fulfillment of this role, he is going down the list of left-wing daydreams, wish-fulfillment fantasies, and unfinished business, and doing his damndest to see them made reality. No more than that, and certainly no less.
Take a look at his latest series of crimes.
(snip)
As for the newly announced nuclear disarmament treaty with Russia, we know even less about that, apart from it being a “breakthrough.” The single concrete point I’ve been able to gather is that the treaty terms will allow 800 launch systems, a provision that only indirectly involves nuclear weapons as such.
If true, this has the feel of complete disarmament and not the nuclear variety at all. Does this mean 800 missiles? Or missiles, bombers, and submarines, and what have you? It doesn’t sound at all good. We’ll know more when Massa O comes down from the big house to explain it to us.
(snip)
Nuclear disarmament was in large part of product of the KGB, the secret sponsors of every disarmament movement from the 1950s SANE to the to the 1980s Nuclear Freeze. But tainted origins don’t matter. Anything is better than nukes, which must be banished forthwith.
(snip)
There is an argument to be made for maintaining a small but useful number of nuclear weapons, but you won’t hear it from the left. Their contention is that nukes are no good and must be gotten rid of in toto. Forget the fact that they ended World War II decisively and quickly, that they helped win the Cold War (Could the West have kept the USSR contained without them? The simple answer is “no”.), and have played a large part in keeping the peace since. No matter — they’re Bad Things, and must be eradicated, along with DDT, alar, fast foods, and Toyota. So Obama has heroically tackled the job — just as Iran is obtaining its own nuclear arsenal. Great timing.
Obama’s List
American Thinker ^ | April 06, 2010 | J.R. Dunn
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2487409/posts
How do we get Barry's ineligibility issues out to the Public in general to make a real impact???
There’s the quote about duck and cover. I noticed he didn’t say he did but that most people his age remember doing that. IOW, he never did because he was in Indonesia. Nice little side step there.
Good news for the day! The last air headed friend who voted for the usurper that I haven’t cut off just said she is now sick that she brought this on our country. People are slowing but surely setting down the kool aid cups but I’m afraid it might be too late.
http://bit.ly/9iwCOQ
Joe Biden spoke to congress in 1992.On the Threshold of the New World Order. An American Agenda for the New World Order. Fulfilling the Wilsonian Vision
To really understand the purpose of Biden's foreign policy white paper, you should probably know what the Wilsonian Vision is. Wilsonianism is based upon former President Woodrow Wilson's "14 Points" speech to Congress in the early 1900s. Parts of this vision include the removal of borders and completely free and unrestricted trade among nations. It calls for the removal of all armaments except the bare necessities needed for domestic safety. Sound familiar? Think Obama's call for the destruction of ALL American nuclear weapons and a refusal to build more, regardless of what our adversaries may have. Finally, it calls for the restructuring of Europe along ethnic and nationalist lines.
For those who don't understand the concept of the "New World Order", allow me to 'splain! By today's standards, the New World Order can be easily translated to mean a real "United Nations" in which there is a world court, a world police force, a world government, etc. American would become subservient to this new government and be forced to obey it's laws. We would, like all nations signing onto the agreement, cease to become an autonomous nation and a part of the "one planet, one government" mentality. The United Nations constitution would replace our constitution.
I find it interesting that back in 1992 when this paper was published, Mr. Biden complained that our standard of living in the United States had stagnated. We could not go any further in our society. Unfortunately, the "change" this country so needs would not come along for another 16 years in the form of one Barack Obama. Isn't it amazing then how much true progress this country has actually seen through those years? The economy improved by leaps and bounds. The United States wrestled the title of the nation with the most millionaires.
The end game I believe is Obama head of the United Nations. King of the world.George Soros in charge of the world bank. Obama along with Pelosi will place as much power as possible within the United nations while Obama is in office.
