Sorry, but you will encourage sexual assault without a rape exception... encourage people to choose life, but don’t dare make it the law to carry a rapists child...
How?
There is such a mind boggling huge disconnect there that I can't for the life of me see how not allowing abortion even for rape VICTIMS, could have any influence on the RAPIST.
Not allowing abortion for rape victims is going to make rape more likely to happen? Or is going to encourage more men to rape women?
Please explain what passes for reasoning in your brain.
Why should the child die for the sins of it’s father? The baby is also an innocent victim of the rape. If you can not raise the child, give it up for adoption so that it can be a blessing for a childless couple.
How does one distinguish between a real rape and a "oops, I got pregnant the guy raped me" defense?
Even thought it would be very difficult to carry a child produced from a rape, you should always side on the side of life.
Also I might add the actual statistics on women getting pregnant from a rape is almost non-existent. I said almost, not never, but under 1% of rapes result in a pregnancy
Allowing a rape exception would equally likely encourage false reports of rape.
The issue is a tough one, with no really good answers. The notion that a child should have to suffer for the sins of a parent is hardly unknown in the Bible, and the sin of a rapist should be considered grave indeed. I am unaware of anything biblically that would require that a pregnant adulteress be allowed to live long enough to give birth; killing the adulteress before she bears a child avoids any risk that the child might challenge the legitimate heirs of the woman's husband. Religiously, I thus think there's room for argument. I really don't see any resolution to the problem of false accusations, though.