Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; Eagle Eye; xzins; wagglebee; Calvinist_Dark_Lord
*chuckle* Remember a few years ago when I was called a modalist and a heretic because I questioned whether "three Persons" was the best way of expressing the Godhead? I've since come to the conclusion that I was right, but that the original Nicene and Athenasian Creeds are technically right as well.

The confusion stems from the fact that the meaning of the key terms--"person" and "begotten" in particular--has changed over time, but the translations haven't kept up and the churches haven't done a good job of educating their people.

The fact is that the Diety of Messiah isn't that difficult to illustrate if one simply accepts that He is the embodiment of what Scripture calls God's Word, His Glory, His Face, His Right Arm, His Wisdom, His Light, His Torah--that which the rabbis call the Sh'khinah. He is generated rather than created or fashioned from God, who is the Father. Just as the Sun doesn't sit down with tools and fashion light, but rather generates light as part of its quintessential nature, so God generates (begets) His Light as a part of His nature.

That illustration, btw, was used by both Tertullian and Irenaeus (if anyone wants to challenge their credentials as Christians, go right on ahead), and by R. Eliezer in explaining the Sh'khinah, the Divine Presence.

Pretty much my only problem with Trinitarianism is its tendency to overemphasize "Tri-". HaShem Echad. Too many Christians are functional Tri-theists, utterly ignorant of their own creeds (even though they'll instantly question the salvation of someone who questions them) and incapable of answering even basic questions about Trinitarianism themselves.

I'm not shooting this at anyone being pinged here. I'm just lamenting the situation in general, especially since it personally impacted me a few years ago, including the loss of at least one FRiend. I still greatly appreciate the support I got from my fellow Neeners.

If I hadn't gotten that support, and if I hadn't delved into this matter through not only Scripture directly, but through both the Christian and the Jewish commentators, I too might have come to the conclusion that "Trinity" was a 4th Century heresy that needed to be expunged rather than being simply misunderstood by the vast majority of its adherants.

Shalom.

421 posted on 04/08/2010 9:49:05 AM PDT by Buggman (HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]


To: Buggman

Oh...I don’t think the Trininty is 4th century at all.

I think it is one of many polytheistic seductions that have been around since Lucifer was kicked out of heaven.


423 posted on 04/08/2010 10:05:55 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

To: Buggman

Excellent post! Thanks.


424 posted on 04/08/2010 10:06:40 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson