Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; wagglebee
I don't see anything in the verse: "the life is in the blood thereof" to say to me that that is the total story. And especially so since we are talking about "spirit" and "physical."

While the life is in the blood is true, it does not necessarily mean that without blood there is no life or that with blood there is always life.

There is plenty of life that exists that has no blood but is living and growing.

Likewise there are bodies of those who have died, which still have blood in them.

By the reasoning of the argument that the life is in the blood therefore a fetus cannot be considered alive because it has no blood, any thing that doesn't have blood in it is not alive, it only has the appearance of life, and then any body which appears to be dead that still has blood in it, can't be declared dead after all, it must be alive.

The *logic* fails miserably.

393 posted on 04/07/2010 7:13:25 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
and then any body which appears to be dead that still has blood in it, can't be declared dead after all, it must be alive.

Good point!

394 posted on 04/07/2010 7:27:50 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson