I am making points entirely by reference to scripture (which I believe to be infallible).
So how does my pointing out from scripture what the scripture actually says "arguing the atheist position"?
The problem is that you are NOT arguing the scriptural position.
So could he.
So you only turn the other cheek if it is reciprocal?
So, pointing out one sides invectives while ignoring the other side's is proper?
So you, Eagle Eye, and Hank Kerchief say. But why should we take your word for it? Frankly, I choose what I understand from my reading of the Bible through prayer and supplication for understanding. And I disagree sincerely with the lot of you. You disagree with us. So be it.
But I will take my understanding and feel very comfortable with it, knowing I will never, ever, argue on the side of allowing abortions to happen because it's wrong for government to intervene one way or another.
As someone Hank invited here pointed out, perhaps the best way is to end the debate and go to God in prayer that all people see the wisdom in ending the abomination that is abortion.
Good day.
You’re telling everyone to back off on the invectives against another poster and are totally SILENT on the invectives BY the other poster.
Why chastise so one sidedly?