So are you the Tea Party voter the writer is talking about? The guy who will stay at home and let the country sink rather than vote for his perfect candidate?
I hope not.
What critics don’t seem to understand about the Tea Parties is that the “party” designation is not political, but rather a reflection of anger and uprising, like the original Boston Tea Party.
Most of us don’t want another organized political party. We just want to throw the bums out and vote in some new faces who may — at least for a while — listen to us.
Therefore, as a voting block, the Tea Parties may prove a very strong force in changing Congress come September, working from outside the established political parties. A magnificently democratic thing to do.
Except for those idealogues who sit home and pout and call every GOP candidate who doesn’t agree with them 100% a “RINO.”
Would you vote for McCain, AGAIN?
I wouldn’t... At some point you have to draw a line, McCain, Snow, Gramnasty, and a few others are on the other side of that line.
If the repubs, teaparty or anybody else wants my vote, they better vote conservative, you can either support a conservative with YOUR vote, and join my vote or go it alone with your Rino. And based on your post, I’ll bet you really think a Rino is the best candidate....
Political party affiliation isn't a marriage. You can dissolve it at any time for any reason. Clinton caused me to divorce the 'Rats. McCain did in my marriage to the Elephants. I'm tired of special interests picking our pockets while they scratch each other's backs. I favor a box on every ballot marked "None of the Above." When I go to the ballot box, I won't be conned by a 'Rat in an Elephant suit. (As a matter of fact, I'm changing my tagline for awhile.)