Chinese coal carrier Shen Neng One ran aground on Douglas Shoal.
Hope this does not become another Exxon Valdez oil spill of '89.
To: myknowledge
Never Drink and Supertanker
2 posted on
04/04/2010 7:29:06 AM PDT by
al baby
(Hi Mom sarc ;))
To: myknowledge; neverdem
Yes, it is an oil leak - and, “no, it is not meaningless” - but there is more oil released (naturally) from undersea vents off the CA coast every day.
If we drilled off of CA to reduce the pressure, there’d even be less oil released.
3 posted on
04/04/2010 7:41:33 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: myknowledge
Not where they’re supposed to be? Defecting, maybe, or perhaps electronic surveillance?
5 posted on
04/04/2010 8:01:21 AM PDT by
JimRed
(To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: myknowledge
Nixon's fault. We never should have been doing business with the Chinese.
(I know it doesn't follow that it would be a cause of an oil spill.....but it feels good to say it.8-)
6 posted on
04/04/2010 8:08:40 AM PDT by
stboz
To: myknowledge
How would a coal carrier become another Exxon Valdez which was a tanker?
7 posted on
04/04/2010 8:09:02 AM PDT by
IMR 4350
To: myknowledge
Hope this does not become another Exxon Valdez oil spill of '89. The Valdez was an oil tanker, carrying oil. This ship is a coal carrier, with just a little oil for it's own engines. It could spill all of it, and while it wouldn't be pretty, it would not came with a couple of orders of magnitude of the Valdez spill. Plus the Valdiz spill was in sheltered waters, this one not.
9 posted on
04/04/2010 8:11:42 AM PDT by
El Gato
("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
To: myknowledge
on purpose???
15 posted on
04/04/2010 9:28:46 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson