You call a person with an ACU life time Conservative rating of 82% a socialist when
Think again about that rating:
To quote a
January 29, 2008 article at American Thinker regardng McManesty's ACU rating:
"Senator John McCain's lifetime rating of 82.3% from the American Conservative Union is often cited as proof that he is conservative. Here is a closer look at that 82.3 rating. First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, the latest year for which the ACU has its ratings posted online. For that most recent year in particular, McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), for example, scored 64 and 75, respectively, in 2006."
Another passage in the article:
"So where did McCain differ from the ACU? The big areas were taxes, campaign finance reform, the environment and, most recently, immigration. There was also a smattering of support for trial lawyers; federal intervention in health, education, safety or voting issues; internationalism; and some social issues."
The article doesn't even factor in his close political association with fellow flaming socialist Joe LIEberman, whose rating at the time was only 16%!
You support a person who supports and is supported by anti war, truthers.
Then it should be easy enough for you to do a search by my username and pull up a quote in support of Paul in the nearly five years I've been on FR to confirm your otherwise baseless accusations.
You still haven't addressed all the issues McAmnesty agrees with the socialists on in post #105 but the n again that's consistent with the Alinsky tactic.