Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Forty-Niner

Sarah Palin does support a “path to citizenship” which is just another form of amnesty. Her interview with Univision was unambiguous on the mater. Confusing the facts or ignoring them is kinda a liberal thing to do dontcha think.


129 posted on 04/03/2010 8:23:23 PM PDT by Breto (never accept the premise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Breto

Palin expands her position on Illegal Immigration

Palin: we need to close the borders. They are called illegal aliens for a reason and if they are not going to follow the rules they should not be in our country.

It’s pretty simple I ratched that one down to the simple answer because its an easier answer than some politicians want it to make it be. you close the borders. You get more agressive about cracking down on the illegal aliens and we take it serious what our border patrol officers are trying to do


December 2009

Lars Larson radio talk show

LARS: The amnesty proposal that was defeated in Congress — in your view, was that amnesty for illegals and would you back amnesty for a path to citizenship, as the current president calls it?

SARAH PALIN: No, I’m not for amnesty. Let’s ratchet this down quite simply to remember what we’re referring to. Illegal aliens are called “illegal” for a reason.

We need to secure our borders and I am not for amnesty. And there are humane ways to deal with the 11-13 million illegal aliens who are in our country right now, but if they’re not going to follow the rules, they need to get out.


140 posted on 04/03/2010 8:34:01 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: Breto

No Sarah said that she supports “a path to citizenship for those that follow the rules.” By definition she is excluding illegal aliens who have not “followed the rules.”

Her answer recognized that the United States will continue to welcome legal immigration. Your problem with that is?

Amnesty is not needed for legal immigrants....ie those that “follow the rules.”

It takes your creative editing to turn her statement into one indicating Palin supports amnesty or is “ambigious.” Maybe your reading comprehension is poor? Or maybe you think mine is so lacking as to let that one slip by?


169 posted on 04/03/2010 9:12:31 PM PDT by Forty-Niner ((.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: Breto

“Confusing the facts or ignoring them is kinda a liberal thing to do dontcha think?”

Yes I do.....what is your DU screen name? It seems you are the one ignoring the full quote, or ignoring facts that do not support your bias for (pick one) Mitt, Ron Paul, Huckster, ad nausium.....

PDS is treatable ya know?


170 posted on 04/03/2010 9:25:49 PM PDT by Forty-Niner ((.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson