Guardians of the Free Republics' letters to governors spur inquiry

Los Angeles Times ^ | April 02, 2010 | Kathleen Hennessey

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

See #56.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks.

[Marine_Uncle]

I have to hit the sack. My mind is shot. But I’ll bookmark for later reading, thanks.

[Carry_Okie]

Even the Constitution Society makes clear the distinction between the Constitution for the United States and the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

[lentulusgracchus]

No, I was referring to your quoted source.

Whenever someone drops the Rothschilds on you ..... it's fair notice that they'll eventually go off on "international Juuuwwws".

Or so it seems, in my experience of conspiracy enthusiasts.

[lentulusgracchus]

See #56.

Contaminated well. Boil before drinking. See my last.

[lentulusgracchus]

Even the Constitution Society makes clear the distinction between the Constitution for the United States and the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Does Chief Justice Roberts concur, or is this a fascination of the named society?

[Carry_Okie]

Does Chief Justice Roberts concur, or is this a fascination of the named society?

I don't know, but would bet that Roberts' staff has consulted the Constitution Society. Take a look; they're the real deal and have been well respected on FR since its inception.

[Marine_Uncle]

I don't buy into the antisemitism either. If what is presented turns out to be verifiable then we should then consider the ramifications. At this point I personally need much time to examine this issue. And then I still won't be qualified in the least, most likely, to make some firm comment either way.
Let some of our folks who have graduate degrees in law take up the challenge as the validity of the post.