Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
What's ridiculous and moronic is your perpetual reliance on Wong Kim Ark for the support of your regimist, citing British law on "subjects" rather than American law on "citizens".

You quote Justice Gray as if he were your holy prophet and yet you ignore all the other Justices who give a clear definition of "natural born citizen" consistent with that of our founders. And where did Gray ever say that Wong is a "natural born citizen"??? Nowhere. That is what we call sophomoric and moronic.

If Wong Kim Ark is your constitution, then all your selective reading of it proves is that Obama is a "natural born subject" of Britain and fully qualified to run for the office of Queen.

202 posted on 04/02/2010 6:53:40 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
"If Wong Kim Ark is your constitution, then all your selective reading of it proves is that Obama is a "natural born subject" of Britain and fully qualified to run for the office of Queen. "

Just more evidence you don't even understand the definition of "constitutional law", nor do you have the capacity to understand Supreme Court decisions.

204 posted on 04/02/2010 7:07:57 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson