I doubt it’s a typo. Whoever wrote that is, IMO, purposely muddying the waters.
I posted this on Jay Sekulo’s site (http://www.aclj.org/Contact/Radioshow.aspx):
Jay:
Do you believe Barack Obama is constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States?
The constitution states that to qualify, one must have attained the age of thirty five and be a Natural Born Citizen.
Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin has stated he will refuse deployment orders until the President proves he is a Natural Born Citizen.
The Army issued a counseling letter to Mr. Lakin, quoted in part below:
“On 30 March 2010, this command became aware of your intentions to refuse to follow deployment orders. Your stated reason for refusal was your belief that the election of the President of the United States is invalid because you believe he is not ‘native born’ [sic]. This counseling is to inform you that your deployment orders are presumed to be valid and lawful orders issued by competent military authority,” said the document from the “counselor,” Lt. Col. William D. Judd.
The letter reminded Lakin of his April 12 due date at Fort Campbell, Ky.
“If found guilty … you could be sentenced to dismissal from the service … forefeiture of all pay and allowances; and confinement for a period of months or years in a military prison,” the warning stated.
Jay: Notice the Army has taken it upon themselves to change the requirement from Natural Born to Native Born.
We Freepers would love to have you participate in the discussion. Here is just one of the many threads on the eligibility issue on Free Republic:
hhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2483906/posts?q=1&;page=1#1
I don’t think it’s a typo, but that is what I would ask Pentagon to clarify the words in the Constitution!!!