Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: canuck_conservative
Chicago is on the Great Lakes, as is Detroit, Cleveland, etc., and would be part of Lib USSA.

As for other ports, well perhaps some Southeastern states on the Atlantic could work. But the headwaters should also be included.

52 posted on 03/31/2010 7:16:34 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51

Abandoning the Great Lakes is akin to handing off an oil field. No one would let their control go - there are already local municipalities fighting over Great Lakes water rights. A freshwater supply like that will only get more valuable as population grows.


65 posted on 03/31/2010 7:35:20 AM PDT by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
Chicago is on the Great Lakes, as is Detroit, Cleveland, etc., and would be part of Lib USSA.

Chiago is ON the Great Lakes, but it drains into the Gulf Of Mexico ... not into the lakes. The flow of the Chicago River was reversed over 100 years ago.

68 posted on 03/31/2010 7:46:33 AM PDT by TheRightGuy (I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson