Posted on 03/31/2010 2:27:52 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
The US Navy is exploring the feasibility of extending the Boeing F/A-18's 6,000h service life to as much as 10,000h to deliver continued combat duty in the light of potential delays to the Lockheed Martin F-35C Joint Strike Fighter.
"We will keep them structurally safe and sound through the next decade," says Rear Adm Mark Skinner, programme executive officer for the navy's tactical aircraft programmes, who adds that parallel improvements will also be made to the aircraft's systems and components.
Speaking at the Navy League conference in Washington DC, Skinner said the over-arching goal for the USN will be to have 44 strike aircraft allocated to each of its carrier air wings by 2030, with these to be composed of F-35Cs and F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.
The navy expects the JSF's carrier variant to achieve initial operating capability in 2015, although the Government Accountability Office in an 11 March audit reported that three independent defence officials "separately concluded that programme cost estimates are understated by as much as $38 billion and that the development schedule is likely to slip from 12 to 27 months".
Under current plans, the navy will receive its last F/A-18s in 2013, bringing to 1,000 the total number of Hornets owned by the navy, US Marine Corps and seven foreign services.
Skinner says keeping the Super Hornet production line operating past 2011 is "an option we will look at more closely" if the JSF is further delayed.
(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...
Until they start disintegrating in the air like ancient F-15s, that is.
Sounds like a return to the air-force of the 70s, when units had to scavenge and scrounge just to keep a few aircraft up in the air.
ping
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
What price now a fresh block of a couple hundred F-14's?
Sure it was overweight, but a stealthy A-6 replacement with the same performance their abouts, I think that could have been lived with even if it was porky.
But on the F-14, I had the privilege of seeing a F-14D perform at the Reno Air Races with the "GE's" in it. It did things I had never seen a F-14 do, an amazing aircraft.
Stupid, stupid, stupid decision not to upgrade them all to this "D" status, (and I can't stand GE, I am a Pratt guy through and through) and for me to say that says a lot....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.