Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

“The whole statutory rape thing, while true (she was under the age of consent) was not forced.”

That’s why it’s called statutory rape.


22 posted on 03/30/2010 2:34:04 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: stop_fascism; SoldierDad

I am aware of the origins of the whole statutory rape charge. I appreciate that a girl that young, according to the law, cannot consent. There need not be any force involved. I get that.

However, my point is how horrible is it that a fifteen year old girl is having sex with multiple partners?

And, if the boys were 17 at the time of the sex, the statutory rape charge is going to be hard to convict on. The age difference and consensual nature of the relationships are going to be a tough sell for the prosecution.

There has got to be a lot more going in here than meets the eye.


37 posted on 03/30/2010 3:48:00 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (This nation, of the people, by the people, and for the people has perished from the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson