Skip to comments.
Obamacare Starts Squeezing the Private Sector
American Spectator ^
| 3.30.10 @ 6:09AM
| By William Tucker
Posted on 03/30/2010 10:13:19 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: Logical me; All
And when the Insurance Industry crashes because they will have to triple Insurance Cost Rates to cover those with Pre-existing Conditions, Obama will dust off the speech that says, "as much as I hate to do it, we have to take over all of the Insurance Industry, too." Obama and his speechwriter have likely already concocted the script ... 
|
21
posted on
03/30/2010 10:53:28 AM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: circlecity
There's a simple reason for that Chairman. Congressmen don't to jail for intentionally disseminating bogus financial statements - Corporate CEOs do. Oh, for the man with the stones to tell him that under oath. Or, simply, "Congressman, I'm under oath and your estimates do not labor under that burden."
I'd vote to put that man's image on the dollar bill.
22
posted on
03/30/2010 10:55:44 AM PDT
by
LTCJ
(The Constitution; first, last, always.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I can't see where the controversy lies for Waxman to find. It sounds like a straight-forward calculation that would fit on a PowerPoint slide with plenty of white space showing. Calculation with the deduction, calculation without the deduction, difference.
The Pubbies would be wise to invite all the CEOs to a press conference ahead of the hearings and lay it all out for the American public.
23
posted on
03/30/2010 11:11:20 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("The real death threat is their legislation" Rush Limbaugh, 3/25/10)
To: NEMDF
I dont think that their retirees get dumped into Medicare system. I think that their retired employees health insurance continues as their primary insurer until death, with Medicare being supplemental. Not sure about this, but many union contracts were set up this way years ago. That's true for union workers, as the company has a contractual obligation to fulfill. That is not true of the non-union & management employees. Some of these big companies have already declared that any medical benefit they provide to non-union retirees will be subordinate to Medicare.
The one I work for provides precious little medical benefit these days, just a high deductible policy that you can (on your own dime) supplement with an FSA.
24
posted on
03/30/2010 11:37:47 AM PDT
by
slowhandluke
(It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
To: Overtaxed Patriot
The lackeys paying union dues will never understand that its the gubmit that has fouled up industry in this country. On another website some clown liberal was arguing that without unions we'd have illegal aliens flying airplanes and unlicensed doctors and dentists. We need a test where someone has to have at least an 80 IQ to vote...of course the libs would never agree to lose 80% of their voter base.
25
posted on
03/30/2010 11:38:44 AM PDT
by
highlander_UW
(Happiness doesn't come from owning something; it comes from being a part of something)
To: Gilbo_3
26
posted on
03/30/2010 11:40:32 AM PDT
by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: andy58-in-nh
“We may soon need to bear this distinction in mind.”
As long as we bear in mind that authority will NEVER recognize such a distinction.
27
posted on
03/30/2010 11:46:35 AM PDT
by
TalBlack
To: Behind Liberal Lines
My sympathy gland for these corporations is running a little dry. They knew these numbers two weeks ago at least. That would have been more than a little helpful then, but not now.
28
posted on
03/30/2010 11:47:57 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
To: TalBlack
Valid authority respects the distinction between dissent and disloyalty.
29
posted on
03/30/2010 11:50:43 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
"These assertions appear to conflict with independent analyses," said the chairman, "which show that the new law will expand coverage and bring down costs."No matter how many times I read the last part of that sentence, it doesn't make sense. You can't expand coverage and reduce costs at the same time. Waxman and Co. do not live in the real world, but that is no surprise to Freepers.
To: MozarkDawg
This is Henry Waxman's STFU notice to the business community: "Don't make waves for us about this!!!"
It's like that nasty letter Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe sent to the CEO of Exxon, demanding Exxon stop forthwith giving grants to global-warming skeptics.
Drink the Kool-Aid or .... or..... or ..... we'll make you drink the Kool-Aid!
I don't think Henry is going to get a lot of respect about this. This is serious money, and he's talking to serious men.
To: Nodems2000; potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo
Ping to article & reply #17
32
posted on
03/30/2010 2:48:14 PM PDT
by
ntnychik
To: circlecity
"These assertions appear to conflict with independent analyses," said the chairman" There's a simple reason for that Chairman. Congressmen don't to jail for intentionally disseminating bogus financial statements - Corporate CEOs do. Absolutely brilliant point!
33
posted on
03/30/2010 3:21:22 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
They get one chance to stick together and squeeze him back harder than he dreamed of. If they fold, he will smash them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson