[rabscuttle385]

This sub-literate post of yours [i.e., "There is absolutely nothing conservative about supporting a full-blown liberal in a GOP primary when there is a credible conservative challenger with his hat in the ring."] has been refuted 3 or 4 times now...

So you're saying that it's okay to support the liberal over the conservative in a GOP primary? Or is it just okay for Palin (yet not for the rest of us) (i.e., double standards)? Or are you expressing annoyance that someone's daring to call out that the emperor has no clothes?

[stephenjohnbanker]

“So you’re saying that it’s okay to support the liberal over the conservative in a GOP primary? Or is it just okay for Palin (yet not for the rest of us) (i.e., double standards)?”

This should be good ;-)

[sickoflibs]

WOW, Your fire (thread) is still burning. And Bob J is back from another time out #3, ready to jump right in with gasoline in hand.

Bob J, Are you the Freeper with 9 lives? Like a moth to a flame you cant resist.

[Chunga]

So you're saying that it's okay to support the liberal over the conservative in a GOP primary? Or is it just okay for Palin (yet not for the rest of us) (i.e., double standards)? Or are you expressing annoyance that someone's daring to call out that the emperor has no clothes?

Listen, collegeboy (I will say this once):

Palin supported Hoffman against the Republican Scozzafava.

She spoke for McCain out of loyalty.

J.D. is anxiously awaiting her endorsement against the 'Rat in the general election.

Hayworth will support the Republican nominee in his district.

How's that vote for the Truther Chuck Baldwin working out for you, TRAULL?