Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prudential to take $100M health care charge in 1Q (ObamaCare)
AP ^

Posted on 03/29/2010 8:56:26 PM PDT by Chet 99

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: FormerACLUmember
In Waxman's letter to the CEO's, he demands all documents, including emails and accounting methods, that show how the companies came to the conclusion that they will sustain losses. The information must be delivered two weeks before the hearings. Therefore, the committee will have time to prepare arguments IN FAVOR of the health plan. Why don't companies have the same right to know the committee's line of attack?

I see another public humiliation exercise in the making. Then, after the cameras are turned off, the real bartering will begin.

21 posted on 03/31/2010 3:44:23 AM PDT by REPANDPROUDOFIT (General, sir, it's ok to call me "ma'am"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
bttt,

Maybe we should put Waxman on trial.

22 posted on 03/31/2010 11:58:56 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
Is this charge, is it a loss for the companies as they cant deduct it from taxes any longer? Correct?

So, this means it will cost a half million jobs??? Or more???

Not bad for a communist plan. Usually they kill alot more people when they implement their plans.

23 posted on 04/01/2010 12:07:26 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
Is this charge, is it a loss for the companies as they can't deduct it from taxes any longer? Correct?

As far as I know - part of the Sarbanes-Oxley law. All companies have to report any changes that materially affect shreholder equity to the SEC [in an expeditious fashion].

They used to be able to deduct for prescription plans paid to retirees. Now they can't - so they have to take the charge now and will continue to do so in the future as long as they pay for those plans.

This directly dilutes shareholder equity so, presumably, at some time in the future - the companies will terminate the plans and the retirees will be stuck with getting prescriptions on their own ...

24 posted on 04/01/2010 12:17:23 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
They are legally required to by the SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley.

Ought to do wonders for the stock market. /sarc

25 posted on 04/01/2010 12:19:16 PM PDT by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson