Skip to comments.
Weekend question II: Does "Obama rapes Liberty" cartoon go too far?
Jill Stanek ^
| 3-27-10
| Jill Stanek
Posted on 03/27/2010 11:42:40 AM PDT by mlizzy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
To: mel
You know, Clinton dabbled in socialism and held those beliefs early on too. And certainly Hillary did, and was a fellow Alinsky-ite as well. The Clintons were dangerous because of THOSE beliefs, not just because Bill wanted to screw anything he could get. But his emotional neediness made him a very poor President as well. The combination of socialist beliefs and desperate emotional neediness makes for a DANGEROUS President. They would take us all down to save themselves.
Bill Clinton is a narcissist and Hillary is a cold and calculating Leftist. They were not good for this country and we fought against them as hard as we could. We saw the evils, the murders, the Chinese deals.
We were right to fight them as hard as we did.
But Barack Obama is worse. Bill Clinton still had a bit of love for America, even as it paled to his need for love himself. He lied to us and hoped we would believe his lies to be the truth. Barack Obama hates this country, hates the American people (Hillary also has no love for the American people), and does not even care if we believe his lies. His narcissistic attitude is “I am lying to you, and F you if you don’t like it. I’ll say what needs to be said, and if there are problems, I’ve got guys to FIX it. You are screwed and I don’t give a flying.”
So I don’t regret ANYTHING we did to fight against the Clintons. They should never have held power in a free country. But they did not put and end to us. Barack Obama seems to be coming close to doing so. And he doesn’t even care.
61
posted on
03/27/2010 1:02:24 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: mlizzy
Squeal, little leftist piggies; squeal.
62
posted on
03/27/2010 1:04:50 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: mlizzy
It’s called Free Speech.
Of course, the left is against free speech. So, they are against this cartoon.
63
posted on
03/27/2010 1:05:30 PM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
To: mlizzy; sheik yerbouty; wastedyears
It's a bit much, IMO...
I prefer THIS image... make it go VIRAL! ;-)
64
posted on
03/27/2010 1:07:19 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
To: RasterMaster; Yaelle; Professional Engineer; dead; Lazamataz
Make this go
VIRAL... just like Obama the Joker did...
65
posted on
03/27/2010 1:08:30 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
To: HiTech RedNeck
The Statue of Liberty can certainly be interpreted as a metaphor for American popular sovereignty, but I’ve always thought of it as something more universal. I think it a personification of the spirit of freedom, which although often shackled and abused stands as a beacon of light to a world too often shrouded in darkness. Obama and his ilk can never extinguish her lamp as long as one man remains alive to keep the flame lit.
66
posted on
03/27/2010 1:08:40 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: mlizzy
Look up Thomas Nast and the Tammany Tiger sometime.
To: mlizzy
68
posted on
03/27/2010 1:12:10 PM PDT
by
mlizzy
("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
To: RasterMaster
I guess someone needs to do a cartoon of him raping Uncle Sam.
69
posted on
03/27/2010 1:14:18 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: nutmeg
Similar thought trains ... :):)
70
posted on
03/27/2010 1:14:24 PM PDT
by
mlizzy
("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
To: nutmeg
71
posted on
03/27/2010 1:15:43 PM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: keats5
Why are we even worried about offending these people? Are they worried about offending us?
Amen to that! The main reason the left keeps it up with their feigned outrage over behavior one-tenth as awful as the stuff they pull is that they have found it very, very easy to get public apologies from sad-puppy-faced Republicans. Why wouldn't they keep at it when it works 80% of the time?
Although I can't stand the man (and will contribute to his primary opponent), John McCain had it right when he stood up to that twit Ann Curry on the Today Show when she asked if Sarah Palin's 'cross-hairs' on her web page was 'inciteful'. Curry was doing what all of the liberals do, seeing if the Republican Apology Complex was in bloom that day. To his credit, McCain shut her down.
We (conservatives, Republicans, logical thinking people) need to stop apologizing and letting the liberals define what is and is not acceptable language and behavior, because they don't subscribe to the same rulebook.
72
posted on
03/27/2010 1:17:10 PM PDT
by
LostInBayport
(2010 - The Second American Revolution. The first shot was fired 1/19/2010 -- here in Massachusetts!)
To: nutmeg
Mere words cannot express my hatred for that son of a bitch. But I think Gandhi had the right idea: evil is best defeated by passive refusal to accept its authority. If directly threatened by illegitimate power, a free and moral people are bound by their duty to act in defense of the lives and liberty that properly belong to them. Let us never reach that terrible moment.
73
posted on
03/27/2010 1:18:34 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: mlizzy
Obama would do it with a smile.
74
posted on
03/27/2010 1:20:57 PM PDT
by
BuffaloJack
("When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: mlizzy
I agree the truth is nevver too far. If they are complaining it means you are right over the target. me thinks the left is going to have to learn to tolerant a lot in the coming months!
To: Balding_Eagle
76
posted on
03/27/2010 1:23:01 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: andy58-in-nh
I disagree. There were other factors that got the British out of India besides Gandhi’s non-violence movement. If it were his movement alone, it would not have worked.
But, OTOH, massive civil disobedience is, IMO, the next step here. Refusals of all kinds, massive national strikes, massive demonstrantions in DC (say 10 plus million people). I think those would have some effect.
77
posted on
03/27/2010 1:24:52 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: sheik yerbouty
It’s going to!Alriiiiiiiiight!!! ;-D
78
posted on
03/27/2010 1:29:17 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
To: andy58-in-nh
Mere words cannot express my hatred for that son of a bitch. But I think Gandhi had the right idea: evil is best defeated by passive refusal to accept its authority. If directly threatened by illegitimate power, a free and moral people are bound by their duty to act in defense of the lives and liberty that properly belong to them. Let us never reach that terrible moment.Great post, Andy!
79
posted on
03/27/2010 1:30:17 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
To: Cicero
Make this go
VIRAL... just like Obama the Joker did...
80
posted on
03/27/2010 1:31:12 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
"Filled with the power of DEMocracy, the President takes time out to salute freedom loving Americans." –Dale / Out of Order, THE BLOG