Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: opentalk
These companies have a responsibility to the shareholders to report long-term liabilities.

Before Zero-care passed Waxman would have hauled them before a committee for NOT doing this.

3 posted on 03/27/2010 11:07:29 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Siena Dreaming

Henry Waxman is an ornament to his profession.

Whatever that profession may be.

At first I thought, maybe “pimp”, but pimps are respectable and conservative businessmen in comparison.


8 posted on 03/27/2010 11:19:47 AM PDT by alloysteel (....the Kennedys can be regarded as dysfunctional. Even in death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Siena Dreaming

It isn’t merely a responsibility to shareholders. It is the law, which requires a company, upon learning of a “material change” in future earnings, to disclose this information.

The removal of the deduction for Medicare payments of retirees from a company is pretty clear in the health care “reform” bill, and the projected impact is fairly easy to compute based on actuarial stats. After that, it is merely accounting as to when these losses are realized.

Net/net, I’d expect (in aggregate) that there is a class of companies with retiree healthcare liabilities who are going to have a hit to future earnings of between 5 to 10% when they finish estimating and reporting the loss of the deduction.

If Waxman (and other liberals) want these companies to keep this quiet, they’re asking these companies to play chicken with the SEC and the law.


28 posted on 03/27/2010 12:44:42 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson