Skip to comments.
Auto Insurance Mandate is a False Argument - Humans are not autos
AIPNews.com ^
| March 27, 2010
| Dave Racer
Posted on 03/27/2010 8:45:04 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
To: newgeezer
Is that a "Yes"? Not if you are wealthy enough to not need insurance.
61
posted on
03/28/2010 10:55:55 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(A Christian Democrat is better than a heathen Republican)
To: IMissPresidentReagan
...driving (on opublic roads)is a PRIVELEDGE - it is NOT a right.
SPOT ON!!!!
62
posted on
04/01/2010 11:46:15 AM PDT
by
RedMonqey
(You only think you are free.....)
To: marstegreg
You buy insurance to cover the things you can’t afford to pay or finance by yourself.
Insurance is nothing but a form of financing.
I think this whole damn country needs to take a college level Risk & Insurance class.
63
posted on
04/01/2010 12:10:57 PM PDT
by
wordsofearnest
(Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
To: marstegreg
My answer to that w/b for the government to have a limited charity hospital system for those who won’t or can’t pay.
That would take all charity cases away from the mainstream hospital system and finally do something to lower costs.
64
posted on
04/01/2010 12:20:02 PM PDT
by
wordsofearnest
(Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
To: marstegreg
That used to be the case before Medicare & Medicaid. Local doctors took their share of the poor folks in a area and everyone got taken care of.
65
posted on
04/01/2010 12:22:27 PM PDT
by
wordsofearnest
(Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
To: tickles
If you’re paying cash lots of doctors & hospitals will give you a discount.
66
posted on
04/01/2010 12:24:00 PM PDT
by
wordsofearnest
(Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
To: Don Corleone
Never...repeat never accept the Marxists premise when starting a discussion. Corollary: Never, EVER, accept a Marxist's word definitions without question. The words they use don't mean the same to them as they do to you.
67
posted on
04/01/2010 12:28:32 PM PDT
by
TChris
("Hello", the politician lied.)
To: EternalVigilance
To be like the new FEDERAL health insurance law, auto insurance would have to cover routine maintenance, parts replacements, and just about everything else...for other people's cars.
68
posted on
04/01/2010 12:28:56 PM PDT
by
TankerKC
(I think P. T. Barnum had his time off by about 59 seconds.)
To: wordsofearnest
I don’t see why they don’t go back to it if it worked?
To: marstegreg
Because now we have “welfare rights” and State & federal mandates and too damn many trial lawyers.
70
posted on
04/01/2010 1:22:17 PM PDT
by
wordsofearnest
(Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson