Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

“Some also raise the possibility that it was an accidental explosion of some munitions the ship carries.”

I know that when dealing with an incident like this, you can’t do the knee jerk reaction thing. Got to attempt to get confirmation again.

However, given the location of this “incident”, an accident would be just a little too coincidental


117 posted on 03/26/2010 9:31:45 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: jhpigott
Right. N. Korea is on everybody’s mind, except NK sleepers and crazy home-grown NK shills.
119 posted on 03/26/2010 9:35:00 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott
The North Koreans are starving (again) and have little faith in their Gov't.

Desperate Gov'ts do desperate things.

120 posted on 03/26/2010 9:37:16 AM PDT by spectre ( Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott

Yes, there are still a couple of other possibilities...

1) Ships don’t routinely spontaneously blow up the way they did from 1880-1945 (Cordite cooking off and what not) but there’s still a lot of explosives and flammable material on board; Jane’s states this class of vessel carries 12 Depth Charges, and these would be stored at the stern.

2) A mine is still a possibility, despite the stern explosion. Mines don’t have to be contact; in addition to magnetic, there are pressure and acoustic-triggered mines, which might not have gone off till most of the ship had passed over.


124 posted on 03/26/2010 9:44:44 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson