Skip to comments.
Cheers reign but jeers also greet Obama (21-year-old student: “We cannot afford this!”)
Globe Gazette ^
| 3/25/10
| Deirdre Cox Baker
Posted on 03/25/2010 8:39:20 PM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Libloather; All
"If I can pull the wool over the eyes of those idiots in Congress, I can CERTAINLY sell this desh-picable law to THESE chump shtudents in Iowa ..."
"I wonder if they know that they are going to pay an average of $1700 MORE on their shtudent loans now that I have NATIONALIZED it ..."
"Shuckers !!!"
21
posted on
03/26/2010 2:23:14 AM PDT
by
Lmo56
To: Kickass Conservative
fatal flaw in our voting system. once the leeches gain more than 50% of the voting block, its all over.
right to vote should be gained, only when you are a taxpayer. Anyone who lives on the public dime, loses that right. why should anyone who is a drain to society, be allowed to vote for more of the same?
22
posted on
03/26/2010 2:29:12 AM PDT
by
tm61
(somewhere in chicago, a ward is missing it's crook)
To: mtntop3
Uh, I don’t think we want a moocher like that in our Military.
“The few, the Proud, the Stay-with-Mommies?”
To: qwertypie
Yeah, at 57 he is described as merely “a fomer resident of Davenport”. What an accomplishment! lol
To: Nowhere Man
Im glad for these young kids standing up and voicing what is wrong with all of this. Some of them, anyway. Most twenty-somethings have no idea the degree to which their futures are being stolen from them....
25
posted on
03/26/2010 4:42:29 AM PDT
by
Thermalseeker
(Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
To: tm61
I agree. Only people who have a stake in the fate of the nation, who have put their money where their mouths are by earning their own keep and paying taxes from their income, should have the vote. Freeloaders will always vote for whatever allows them to suck the blood of the productive, no matter what it does to everybody else's freedom.
26
posted on
03/26/2010 7:12:13 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
To: GloriaJane
Who was it, some “Weiner” guy on O’Reilly
vehemently screaming that no one would be penalized
for not having insurance
and that the IRS would not be in charge of that enforcement.
27
posted on
03/26/2010 7:13:41 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
"Who was it, some Weiner guy on OReilly"
vehemently screaming that no one would be penalized for not having insurance and that the IRS would not be in charge of that enforcement."
Yes. Guess he should have read the bill before he voted on it. Just kidding. He knew what he voted on, they just don't want the truth getting out to regular citizens before November. That's why he lost it on O'Reilly.
28
posted on
03/26/2010 10:22:29 AM PDT
by
GloriaJane
(Pro-Choice = Pro-Death........ Pro-Life = Pro-LIFE!)
To: southernsunshine
Liberlism: the irrational fear of self-reliance
29
posted on
03/26/2010 10:30:42 AM PDT
by
QualityMan
(1994 is right around the corner........)
To: Mike Darancette
Under Democare kids can stay on their parents insurance until 26 years old. What if the parents dont want to pay? Can parents be forced to pay?My question also.
30
posted on
03/26/2010 10:43:08 AM PDT
by
Terabitten
("Don't retreat. RELOAD!!" -Sarah Palin)
To: QualityMan
Liberalism: the irrational. Fixed it:)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson