I know, I know, the Birth Certificate thing. To wit we have no concrete evidence, nor do we have statutory requirements for him to produce said BC. California has a ballot law but it’s obviously not strong enough.
Well..., that's the most intelligent things I've seen written about the "Birth Certificate thing" -- after months and months of hand-wringing and screaming (by some) here on Free Republic....
Congratulations for managing to say something sensible about that issue... :-)
[ ... however let me warn you right now, that you are now a target of the "Obama Derangement Syndrome" group on Free Republic... put your shields up, right away... LOL ...]
I am not so sure about this. Isn't the Quo Warranto rule statutory? (Maybe it's just common law, but I think I saw something about it being statutory.)
Besides, a federal lawsuit by any party with legal standing definitely does have the potential to force Obama to produce the original BC.
Inarguably concrete evidence --which is not the same as proof, of course--DOES exist to pose at least a serious challenge to Obama's eligibility. The two problems are: 1) demonstration of standing as a plaintiff, and 2) finding a federal judge and appellate judges up the line who are courageously reasonable, courageously honest judges.