Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: isthisnickcool

Yours is a good point, and thus the annual push to sign up subscribers. they need to expand the risk pool to include a LOT of people who have no realistic chance of ever experiencing a catastrophic flood.

Unfortunately (for FEMA), most people look around their homes, and realize that they live on a hill, not in a flood plain, and decide they could spend that money better elsewhere. The answer of course is to FORCE them to buy coverage, heedless of whether they want or need it.

Wait. That sounds familiar. Force them to buy coverage whether or not they want or need it... Where did I just hear that? Don’t help me, I’ll think of it...


7 posted on 03/25/2010 12:34:41 PM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SargeK

Tremendous errors are being found on the new FEMA maps. People are having to pay for “elevation surveys” to show their properties are not in flood zones, after getting a notice from their lender that they now have to pay for flood insurance. It can cost from $1200 to $10000 per year.


9 posted on 03/25/2010 12:56:53 PM PDT by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson