[etradervic]

I am not a lawyer but I would think that a State law, that endangered minors and that nullified parental rights, would not be constitutional. Am I wrong?

[Cboldt]

-- I would think that a State law, that endangered minors and that nullified parental rights, would not be constitutional. Am I wrong? --

The judges find it all to be in constitutional order. I looked at the Texas (Jane Doe) cases, and learned what a scumbag Alberto Gonzalez is, based on his rulings as Supreme Court (of Texas) judge. Texas!

I would presume that California, Washington, Massachusetts, New York, etc. are even less respectful of "parental rights."

[topher]

I don't know.

But this might come under the heading of child endangerment.

According to Medical Law, a child cannot consent to such a medical procedure -- only the parents. I am studying Practical Nursing, and we covered this recently, as we could be liable if a minor has a medical procedure without the parents consent.

[Rich Knight]

The public schools do not care about ‘parental rights’.

To the educational bureaucracy, ‘parental rights’ are an anachronism to be erased.