Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2010 5:19:58 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red in Blue PA

Forgot to add....BOR asked the question about 5 times!


2 posted on 03/24/2010 5:20:43 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Thinking of using 911 for protection? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

never ask your weiner a simple question...you’ll never get a straight answer


3 posted on 03/24/2010 5:21:36 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA
I was watching too.

Bet my BP went up over 150

4 posted on 03/24/2010 5:21:43 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Weiner compared having to pay a fine for not buying healh insurance to having to pay a fine for littering. ...and O’Reily let that slide (or he didn’t hear it during the chaotic exhange).


5 posted on 03/24/2010 5:22:08 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

I watched that.He would not tell who would come after the people who refuse to pay for obama care.Dodged the question 5 times,then complained Bill would not let him answer the question.


6 posted on 03/24/2010 5:22:26 PM PDT by tapatio (In memory of my Dad 5-27-26 2-4-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

The big question is why he would not tell who would come after the people.


9 posted on 03/24/2010 5:24:17 PM PDT by tapatio (In memory of my Dad 5-27-26 2-4-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Isn’t it the IRS? I thought I just heard they were adding 18,000 employee’s. Or was that a future expansion?


11 posted on 03/24/2010 5:25:08 PM PDT by vpintheak (Love of God, Family and Country has made me an extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

O’Reilly kept asking him what government agency would fine someone who refused to buy health insurance. Weiner kept saying, “We’re not going to criminalize it”.


15 posted on 03/24/2010 5:27:51 PM PDT by Krankor (nO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

It was good, pathetic.


19 posted on 03/24/2010 5:29:10 PM PDT by Williams (It's the policies, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Did O’Reilly ask that little Weiner why the congress
men are exempt from this POS plan if it is so great? This issue should be used to confront these bastards at every turn. It is the hight of arrogance for them to shove this plan down the throats of all Americans, and then turn around and exempt themselves from having to participate! What a bunch of crap!


23 posted on 03/24/2010 5:32:58 PM PDT by Batman11 (Sarah Palin: "Illegal immigrants are called illegal for a reason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Bookmarking, hoping for video of this.


24 posted on 03/24/2010 5:34:47 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

The answer is that the penalty for not having insurance is administered through the tax return.

Weiner’s statement that the government is not criminalizing failure to pay the penalty and the government will not come after someone for not paying it is grossly misleading.

As I understand it, there is language in ObamaCare saying the government cannot obtain a lien on your house and denies them certain other remedies to enforce the penalty.

But that provision is really a smokescreen.

The government will already have your money through withholding taxes and estimated tax payments. THAT is how they plan to enforce it. If you truthfully state on your tax return that you have no insurance and you do not include the penalty in computing your return, the government will deduct it from your withholding or estimated tax payments, and reduce your refund. If you owe tax, it will be added to the amount you owe and failure to pay will accrue further penalties and interest.

I believe the reason the liberals didn’t explicitly criminalize this particular provision is that they didn’t need to. The tax code already has enforcement provisions, and it wasn’t necessary to add anything to enforcement the ObamaCare penalty.

For example, if someone lies on their return and says they have insurance but they don’t, there are already laws on the books about lying on your return and the remedies therefore.

And monetary amounts are fungible - purporting to isolate one line item on the tax return and apply different enforcement remedies to that item from the other items on the return would be impracticable in any event.


26 posted on 03/24/2010 5:40:44 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

This exchange was embarrasing. Wiener was really acting like a child.


27 posted on 03/24/2010 6:11:54 PM PDT by pb929
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson