Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww

Thanks. Then I wonder why MSNBC would have made it sound the exact opposite?


63 posted on 03/24/2010 6:49:19 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Wisconsinlady
That's why folks here always say confirm, and they want links...and then read the links, otherwise we can fall for the framing and spin media puts on things..they want an audience..it's a numbers thing..and also often like drama they want to lead us from one episode to the other..

MSNBC is well known for more than slanting the news...even against the demos when it will entice a listening audience.

65 posted on 03/24/2010 7:01:08 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Wisconsinlady

The complete text of the current HYDE AMMENDMENT:

Public Law 111-8
H.R. 1105, Division F, Title V, General Provisions

SEC. 507. (a) None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for any abortion.

(b) None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion.

(c) The term `health benefits coverage’ means the package of services covered by a managed care provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement.

SEC. 508. (a) The limitations established in the preceding section shall not apply to an abortion—

(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or

(2) in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed.

(b) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as prohibiting the expenditure by a State, locality, entity, or private person of State, local, or private funds (other than a State’s or locality’s contribution of Medicaid matching funds).

(c) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as restricting the ability of any managed care provider from offering abortion coverage or the ability of a State or locality to contract separately with such a provider for such coverage with State funds (other than a State’s or locality’s contribution of Medicaid matching funds).

To go to the Abortion in Health Care index, click here.
To go to the NRLC Home page, click here.
To go to the NRLC Legislative Action Center, click here.


67 posted on 03/24/2010 7:08:59 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson